Summative Evaluation of Dragon Tales

Final Report

 

 

 

CONDUCTED FOR

 

SESAME WORKSHOP

 

New York, NY

 

 

 

 

 

by

Dr. Langbourne W. Rust

LANGBOURNE RUST RESEARCH, INC.

 

 

 

© 2001  Sesame Workshop   All Rights Reserved


Table of Contents

EXECUTIVE SUMMARY............................................................................................................................................... 1

Background........................................................................................................................................................... 1

Purpose.................................................................................................................................................................... 1

Design.......................................................................................................................................................................... 2

Findings..................................................................................................................................................................... 2

IN-SCHOOL VIEWING - OVERALL EFFECTS....................................................................................................... 4

Design Details....................................................................................................................................................... 4

Design Controls...................................................................................................................................................... 4

The Control Program............................................................................................................................................ 4

TV exposure............................................................................................................................................................. 4

Sample........................................................................................................................................................................ 5

Methods.................................................................................................................................................................... 5

Assessment Questionnaire: The Devereux Early Childhood Assessment..................................................... 6

Individual Child Interviews................................................................................................................................. 7

Direct Observations During Free Play.............................................................................................................. 8

Results....................................................................................................................................................................... 9

Overall Series Effects............................................................................................................................................. 9

ASSESSMENT QUESTIONNAIRES..................................................................................................................... 9

Composite Devereux Ratings............................................................................................................................... 9

Teacher Devereux Ratings................................................................................................................................. 12

Researcher Devereux Ratings............................................................................................................................ 14

Parent Devereux Ratings.................................................................................................................................... 16

Comparison of Teacher, Researcher, and Parent Ratings........................................................................... 18

Individual Child Interviews....................................................................................................................... 19

Pre-Post Structured Building Task Interview Results.................................................................................. 19

Free Play Observations................................................................................................................................. 21

Section Summary.............................................................................................................................................. 22

SCHOOL VIEWING - EPISODE STUDY................................................................................................................. 23

Background......................................................................................................................................................... 23

Section Summary.............................................................................................................................................. 24

Attention to the Episodes........................................................................................................................... 24

Comprehension of Goals, Emotions, and Persistence................................................................ 27

HOME-VIEWING STUDY........................................................................................................................................... 29

Purpose.................................................................................................................................................................... 29

Section Summary.............................................................................................................................................. 29

Method.................................................................................................................................................................... 29

Sample.................................................................................................................................................................... 29

Timing.................................................................................................................................................................... 30

Instruments............................................................................................................................................................ 30

Results..................................................................................................................................................................... 31

Favorite Programs............................................................................................................................................... 31

Co-viewing Rates Per Program......................................................................................................................... 33

Adult Co-Viewer Involvement............................................................................................................................ 34

What Parents and Children Talk About.......................................................................................................... 34

Comments Made While Watching..................................................................................................................... 35

Perceived Effects of Viewing: Dragon Tales vs. Other Favorites................................................................ 37

Attributes of Children's Programs That Parents Like................................................................................... 38

Reasons Shows Are Fun to Watch Together................................................................................................... 38

Program Echoes................................................................................................................................................... 40

Impact on Mood................................................................................................................................................... 41

Child Learnings................................................................................................................................................... 42

PROJECT CONCLUSIONS....................................................................................................................................... 45

LOOKING TO THE FUTURE...................................................................................................................................... 48

 

 

 


EXECUTIVE SUMMARY

Background

This is a summative evaluation of whether the children's TV series, Dragon Tales, is meeting its educational objectives.  Dragon Tales was produced with funding from the Corporation for Public Broadcasting through the U.S. Department of Education and created to fit within the Ready to Learn block of programming on PBS.

 

The series was designed to help children 2 to 6 years old (with a primary emphasis on reaching 4 year olds) develop strategies for meeting challenges in their lives: social challenges like developing and maintaining relationships, emotional challenges like coping with fears, physical challenges like learning new skills (e.g., learning to ride a bicycle) and cognitive challenges like trying to follow clues and solve problems. 

 

Within the framework of enhancing children's readiness to face challenges, three educational goals were defined for the series:

·        To encourage young children to pursue the challenging experiences that support their growth and development.

·        To help young children recognize that there are many ways to approach and learn from the challenging experiences in their lives.

·        To help young children understand that to try and not succeed is a natural and valuable part of learning.

 

To achieve its goals, Dragon Tales presents children with a magical world on the TV screen where two young children, Emmy and Max, and their dragon friends have adventures together.  Along the way they face the kinds of challenges that young children are likely to face.  The educational premise is that by using dramatic situations to convey the kinds of developmental challenges faced by the viewers themselves, and by providing them with models for coping with them, they will become emotionally invested, pay attention to what the characters do, and expand their repertoires for facing the challenges in their own lives.

 

Facing challenges requires getting children to see situations in terms of goals or objectives, and to respond by taking initiative and trying to master them.  Therefore, the kinds of models that Dragon Tales characters provide entail framing goals, trying different approaches to solve a problem, and persisting until an appropriate resolution is reached. In addition, the series also models the benefits of collaborating with others to meet the challenges that they face.

 

Purpose

The primary objective of the current study was to find out whether regular watching of Dragon Tales has a positive effect on 4-5 year old children's pursuit of challenges in their everyday lives and on their establishment of collaborative relationships with others.  Secondary objectives were to determine whether the show is appealing, involving and comprehensible, whether it stimulates interaction between parents and children and whether it gets integrated into children's lives, beyond the immediate context of the TV viewing situation.

 

Design

The project was broken down into 3 studies, two using school viewing, one using home viewing. 

 

School Viewing

Overall Effects Study - evaluated the cumulative effects of Dragon Tales, when it is viewed on a daily basis for several weeks, by measuring pre-test/post-test changes on a number of resilience factors related to facing challenges and forming collaborative relationships. A control group, which viewed a different educational TV series (Between the Lions), provided a baseline for separating the effects of program content from normal developmental changes over the viewing period. The control program was selected because its curricular objectives, which focus on reading, have little overlap with the Dragon Tales curriculum. Consequently, the control program (which has been shown to be educationally effective in other research) was not expected to have a significant impact on the variables measured in this study relative to the experimental group.

Episode Attention and Comprehension Study - evaluated children's attention levels and comprehension of emotional and goal-oriented content in a selected number of Dragon Tales shows.  The control program provided a point of comparison for assessing attention levels to Dragon Tales.

Home Viewing

Home-Viewing Study - evaluated natural home viewing patterns, program appeal and the relationship of Dragon Tales to child behavior and parent-child interactions at home. 

 

The designs and instruments are described in more detail in the descriptions of each of the studies that follows.

Findings

 

Dragon Tales had a broad-based impact on the degree to which viewers demonstrated goal-oriented behavior and social collaboration with peers.  Appeal, comprehension and attention levels were high.  In addition, it stimulated many adult-child conversations about key program themes in the normal course of viewing at home.  Highlights of the key findings from each of the studies are presented here:

 

      The Overall-Effects Study showed that Dragon Tales viewers demonstrated significantly more positive change in goal orientation and social relationships than children who watched the control program over the same period. These differences were robust, being reflected across a variety of different kinds of measures that included ratings by various groups of individuals with different roles who saw the children in different settings. 

 

·        According to ratings by parents, teachers and researchers, Dragon Tales viewers made statistically significant gains, relative to the control group baseline, in how often they "Choose challenging tasks," "Start or organize play with others," "Share with other children," and "Cooperate with others.”